Board Meeting
Minutes Review Beginning in 2016
I read all the board minutes available online as far back as
2016. Yep, you might say I was bored, LOL. I found that one can learn a lot
from what’s in or not in the minutes. One of my objectives was to see if there
is a trail for what board members were voted in and for how long. Note that
anything in red are my cheeky comments. I take the HOA seriously but with a big
measure of humor too. Here’s my summary:
2016
·
No annual meeting notes for 2016
·
Minutes for 2016 are
serious lacking in detail.
2017
·
Nothing posted for 2017 annual meeting and
January board meeting.
·
Covenant proposed changes presented in March
minutes from a special meeting prior to board meeting. No details.
·
Typical of all 2017 minutes you’ll find ““the
topic was discussed” with no details. Woohoo,
that’s helpful.
·
May minutes noted a board member was moving and
would not be replaced in 2017 and open position was not mentioned again in 2017
and the board member was no longer in attendance after July.
·
In August the board agreed to allow sewer access
for a $10,000 donation to the playground project. The land on Redglobe will be
deeded to the homeowner. The water connection on Mountain Rose will remain
as-is. Where are the legal documents/agreements on these
“exchange.”
·
In September the new playground was approved
with installation set for December.
·
In November meeting it was noted that two board
positions needed to be filled.
Current terms were as follows (which don’t add up logically for me and current positions
are in a debate even now. The math needs to work folks.)
Jim D: 1 year left
Jaime: 1 year left
Jim L: 2 years left
Rich: OPEN
Jeff: 2 years left
Other: OPEN Carol: 2 years left
December: Board to address postings and accusations Jim Donahue expressed the concerns from the board regarding the accusations on the OF Community Events & Happenings group page. Resident guests requested the board go through the budget line by line and receive explanations for each expense. Additionally, it was requested to review the contracts for landscaping and pool maintenance contract. Other topics discussed were cost of items/services, communication between the board and residents, and future updates to the covenants/by-laws. No decisions were recorded.
2018
·
Covenant Changes: Bob Woods needs to schedule a
visit with the attorney. A deadline is needed to ensure this project continues
to advance. There was some concern from residents that these haven’t been
readily available for community review. Jim L. explained that the document is a
draft and review by an attorney only provides the HOA legal guidance on how to
move forward. There will be opportunities for community review at a later date.
·
Audit: Several residents have requested an audit
of the HOA financials. It was also suggested to search by Tax ID in the event
there are lost bank accounts during property management company transitions. A
brief discussion concluded that if an audit takes place, there needs to be a
written specification detailing what it will cover. The topic will be deferred
to the next board.
2018 –annual meeting
·
Introduction of nominees - Each nominee
introduced themselves and provided an explanation of why they want to serve. –
· John Guarino was removed from the ballot – Mike Dahms and Erin Sebring were added as floor nominations. –
·
Final Ballot: - Richard Avery - Stephanie Hunt -
Faye Kiger - Sue Seidel - Vicky Smith - Denise Williams - Mike Dahms - Erin
Sebring
·
Concern of the proposed changes of the covenants
and lack of community feedback. Residents would like to view the current
proposal. An audit was requested on an annual basis - Concern over the way
budget and financials are arranged
·
Results of election:
Sue Seidel and Richard Avery were
elected
New board designated the following
positions.
Jaime Pinochet – President –
Jim Donahue – V. President –
Sue Seidel – Treasurer –
Rich Avery – Secretary –
Jeffrey Belk – Member at Large –
Jim Le Claire – Member at Large –
Carol Hendrix – Member at Large
·
In February the board discussed that proxies
were required in the past due to lack of annual meeting attendance. It was
suggested that 2019 board candidates should be identified earlier in the year
and distributed to the community prior to the annual meeting and vote. This is not a requirement in our documents and members can be nominated from the floor at annual meetings.
3/2018
·
Since not less than seventy-five (75%) percent
of the Lot Owners must approve covenant changes, the lawyer recommended changing
Article 9, Section 3 to a more realistic percentage. And:
1.
If 75% is not reached, the lawyer would help
convince a judge for another vote accepting proxies and unanswered votes as
“Yes” to reach 75%.
2.
This will require strong marketing,
meetings, communication, self-addressed stamped envelopes, and a door-to-door
campaign for a vote.
3.
The lawyer indicated the process would take
years and may not be achievable because the way our covenants were written.
4.
By-Law changes do not need Lot Owner
approval and can be changed by the HOA Board.
5.
Attempting to limit the number of renters in
the neighborhood would be difficult to achieve since there is no legal leverage
to enforce this proposal.
6.
Lawyer confirmed the decision to raise dues
was a valid action of the HOA.
I
wonder what makes the 2023 board think that anything has changed and why are
they spending money on a lawyer now?
· The board approved a letter to send to homeowners to move ahead with a vote on the covenants change. In July a second letter was in the works.
·
Motion was passed to NOT include in the
minutes who voted in favor of or against any actions. Isn’t
this interesting? CYA?
·
As required by the new guidelines in the SC
Homeowners Association Act, all HOA documents need to be recorded with the
State no later than Jan 10, 2019. Documents were
sent to property management company for filing. So the
board knew about the law but must have failed to read it carefully regarding
charging fees, i.e., clubhouse rental. The board cannot claim ignorance of
the law.”
·
Two board positions need to be filled for 2019 .
Mark Balcer and Doug Blake applied for these positions and were elected.
·
Board member positions for 2019:
Sue Seidel-President -
Mark Balcer-Vice President -
Doug Blake-Treasurer -
Stephanie Hunt-Secretary -
Carol Hendrix-Member at Large -
Jim Le Claire-Member at Large -
Jeff Belk-Member at Large
2019
·
Covenant-lawyer made 3 suggestions on how to
amend the covenants. A motion was passed to use Method 1 which is send out a
letter. We [the board} need to ask the lawyer if there is a timeframe to
receive the letter back and write up the amendment. I
wonder what methods 2 and 3 were.
·
Beginning in April the campaign to change the
covenants began. Notary Publics were definitely busy
LOL.
·
In July it was noted that Doug is due to receive
next YOTM, Carol is reaching out – this may be the
issue that made me quit that I explained in my first post.
·
In August the board discontinued the campaign to
change the covenants and stated a different lawyer might be needed by future
boards. A board member suggested using e-signing and Gwen (property manager)
said she would look into that.
·
A new 3-year contract was approved for Harrison
Landscape Management. Where is that contract?
· In October the minutes noted that “Chris is meeting with Landscaper regarding ground cover on S. Orchard Farms -Requesting a copy of bills to be sent to the landscaper committee so they can review that the work has been completed.”
·
The board approved a new C. Dan Joyner contract. I can’t seem to get access to any property management
contracts to review but found my right to do so in the Covenants so I will request a review of a number of documents soon.
2020
·
Three open board positions. Jeff, Jim, and Carol
are at the end of their terms.
·
At the annual meeting Kim Andersen-Lee and
Carl Fischer applied.
·
The minutes state “No Vote needed and we still
have one opening Email Gwen.” What the heck does this
mean?
·
In February the board approved Carol Green as a
new board member
·
Nothing significant appeared in minutes from
March through May.
·
Stephanie Hunt Secretary on the board has
resigned. Carol Green-Member at Large took over the position of
Secretary. Does “took over” mean the same thing that
the current board member did and now they want him ousted (see 2023 board meeting info)?
·
Nothing of note happened in July through
December.
2021
·
At the 2021 annual meeting, Denise Williams and Marianne
Arteaga were voted in as new members. Whom did they
replace? Again, I struggle making the math make sense.
·
The board approved positions for 2021:
President: Kim Anderssen-Lee Vice President: Mark Balcer Treasurer: Doug Blake
Secretary: Carl Fisher At Large: Carol Green At Large: Denise Williams At
Large: Marianne Arteaga.
·
June board meeting
minutes are missing from the website.
· Voted in as three new Board Members were: Kim Carambia , Stacey Sherman, Ricky Wallace, In addition, Marc Balcer returned to the Board to take over an open 2-year slot (from a member who resigned during 2021). ???
·
The board assigned positions as follows:
The New Board met briefly to determine positions (and
remaining terms as Board members)
President: Kim Anderssen Lee (1 year remaining)
Vice President: Marc Balcer (2 year term)
Secretary: Carl Fisher (1 year remaining)
Treasurer: Kim Carambia (3-year term)
Denise Williams: At large (2 years remaining)
Stacey Sherman: At Large (3-year term) Ricky Wallace: At
Large (3-year term)
·
There was no post for February board meeting
minutes.
·
Equipment for showing movies was discussed with
some prices presented.
·
HVAC was replaced at clubhouse for $14K.
·
New treadmill was approved. Wonder how many homeowners use the workout room?
·
Got quotes to replace entrance signs.
·
Planning for Octoberfest began. Thus with this much advance, getting the electrical outlet
was not an “emergency.”
·
Voted to raise the HOA dues in September for
2024. So the current increase has been in the works for
quite some time. Hmmm, looks like there was plenty of time to notify me of the
proposed increase as required by the covenants LOL.
·
Mirrors were installed to address line of sight
issue at NOF and Cresthaven.
2023
·
The Anglican Church St. George the Martyr
request to attach to OF sewer system. The board denied their request.
·
Arbor Walk, Baker’s Garden, Carriage Place, and The
Courtyard neighborhood signs were removed. Nothing in
the minutes indicated why except a reference from a guest indicating they were looking
shabby.
·
Roper Mountain entrance plants were updated. Wow do they need attention now! The myrtles need thinning,
most plants need some food, etc.
·
Mauldin Christian Academy outside pool
membership was denied.
·
In March the covenants committee began work on
another effort to update our covenants.
·
Also in March the board minutes state: “Guidelines
to follow for board meetings – it was agreed that we would all try to
follow the basic Roberts Rules of Order for our board meetings. This should
help speed up the meeting and eliminate side chatter.” After
I began attending meetings in May/June timeframe, there was little, if any,
evidence of this. It’s still a circus.
·
The HOA board voted 3:1 to approve the purchase
of the BodyCraft HFT Pro for $2,499. I certainly appreciate the value of amenities
and that the HOA has an obligation to keep them safe. However, it would be nice
to know how many folks use it. Since there is no keyless entry, maybe I can
find out how many keys have been issued.
·
The July meeting was packed with details such as
“discretionary” spending amount that does not require board approval.
Historically it has been $500. Quotes on repaving clubhouse parking lot were
reviewed. Guests questioned why homeowners are not allowed to see vendor
bids/quotes. Questions regarding transparency of Board and property managing
company as to where and to whom budget monies are spent (vendor transparency)
were raised. Most of these issues were left unresolved.
The typical response as always was somebody “will look into it.”
·
Mailbox maintenance was a key topic in 2023.
Covenants do address how mailboxes should be maintained and that HOA can
replace and charge homeowner for repairs/replacement. Although several
strategies were put forth, mailbox discussion was tabled until September
meeting; however, the property manager was directed to not focus on mailboxes
during her monthly ride through for now. Haven't seen anything else on mailboxes this year.
·
In August, there was a lengthy discussion of
what property is owned by the HOA, the state, and the county that affects
entrance signs, landscaping, line of sight issues, etc.
Nothing was resolved and I find no clear strategy on
record.
·
Also in the August meeting there was a lengthy
discussion on the proposed changes to the covenants.
The minutes show no clear decisions except to send out
the survey to homeowners to rate what’s most important to them. Please note
that I participated in some of those meetings and wrote the first draft of the
survey. However, I stopped participating due to concerns about truth and
transparency.
·
Ricky Wallace stated in the August meeting that
“Beginning September 1st, each home (as noted by address) will receive their
first tennis court / amenities key at no charge and subsequent keys will be
given at a charge of $ 5.00. Town and Country to handle receipt of payment for
subsequent keys.” I have yet to receive a key and can’t
imagine the appropriateness of making one for me and many other homeowners who
do not use the tennis court.
·
Also in August, the board raised the amount
allowed as discretionary spending without board approval to $1,000.
·
The August minutes state: David McPhearson “reviewed
his position on charging rental fees for the clubhouse, which his
interpretation is that this is not allowed by the Covenants or By-Laws. Other interpretations allow it, including an
opinion by a lawyer for another community. It was decided/voted that we
would continue to charge rental fee for the clubhouse, but that for 2024 budget
planning we would zero out the fee. It
was also agreed that the Board would need to make changes to the by-laws and/or
change the clubhouse rental procedure.”
How an attorney for another development interprets our
covenants and bylaws cannot be the basis of a decision by the board. The HOA documents
and the South Carolina law either allow or disallow such charges. The trend I
see running through the decisions made by the Board is to use whichever
interpretation is convenient. I remember clearly that David stated when he
first brought this up that the board should “do what’s right for the homeowners.”
At that time the board rejected the motion to even discuss it.
·
The swim team and pool issues were the major
point of conversation in the September meeting. Discussion continued on the process
for getting quotes for work over $1000 (as approved by the Board) we need to
seek three bids. This was briefly
debated whether that limit was high enough, but any further discussion was
tabled.
· In the October meeting, the 10% increase in HOA dues was approved making dues for 2024 $506. The intent of the increase is to increase the capital reserve fund, the same as the previous year’s increase. Approving the 2024 operating budget was postponed and the board decided an email vote would be used to approve it. After board member Mark Balcer expressed concern that the 2023 increase was spent on excess budget items rather than increasing the capital reserve fund, Carl Fisher stated there were “outliers” in the operating budget that could not have been expected.
·
Mark Balcer with Point of Order; requests for
item emailed to HOA president regarding Electrical project / Installed outlets
near Soccer and Tennis courts to be added to the agenda for New Business. Kim
suggests items to be tabled due to lack of time. Mark emphasized the need for
an answer to his emailed question and desire to be added to this October Board
meeting’s agenda; Discussion denied by Kim and tabled for November 14 Board
meeting.
·
November special meeting is listed as a draft
and appeared to be discussion of line-by-line items in proposed budget. One
item stands out as stated in minutes: “Line 5232 – Much discussion regarding
Pool Family Movie Nights – related to need to pay for Movie Rights and Showing.
Will follow-up with attorney to determine if necessary.” Evidently movies have been shown with no
copyright permission. That could be expensive if anyone presses charges since
all such events sponsored by the HOA are considered public unless otherwise
advertised.
No comments:
Post a Comment